It is important that
public officeholders clarify the issues that citizens are distraught about. One
such issue has been the case of rising public debt. Kemi Adeosun's piece comes in the context of the well-rehashed
situation that the current administration met upon taking office. With its hail
of campaign promises without counting the cost, the Buhari-led government
pushed itself into a tyranny of expectations. I guess Nigerian politicians will
be more mindful when they make promises, as the campaign pamphlets had programs
with at least N19tn yearly to fulfill.
We must also understand
that the issue of debt is not treated with consternation, as Kemi Adeosun
wrote. It is a right argument that requires our interest in inter-generational
equity. If we are amassing the debt that will be a burden on future revenues,
it is important to demand more transparency on what exactly we are bequeathing
the future and the economic viability of it. Nigeria paid $13bn to settle the
Paris Club of creditors mostly tied to frivolous infrastructure that had no
economic impact on the current generation.
It must also be said that
this administration has not been more transparent than previous governments as
regards debt numbers. I reckon that DMO has to be one of the best-managed
government institutions with how it maintains an updated register of the
national debt. Several officers who worked at state governments where it is
nearly impossible to get fiscal numbers and currently at the federal level are
surprised at this level of transparency, but we must be vigilant that this not
rolled back in a bid to silence varied discussions. Despite the anti-corruption
crusade, it has become impossible to get a detailed breakdown of the N1.2tn
capital releases as claimed for 2016 budget cycle. Except for NNPC that started
its monthly operations and financial reports, this administration has not been
more transparent than previous governments, and it needs to sincerely improve
this. The Buhari-led government has not provided details of capital releases on
the project basis, no bold attempts on open contracting, never applied punitive
sanctions to those indicted in Auditor-General reports or any tangible thought
on campaign financing, a drain on public resources at all levels. So which
improved transparency are we talking about?
Diving into the numbers,
the unfortunate thing about the current fiscal management is how it has not
shown any belt-tightening approach in the way public officers parade
themselves. We don’t know any radical approach to reduce aides of public
officers nor has there been any interactive party-level discussions on the
National Assembly to rein its cost. In a budget approved during the recession, it
is still littered with purchase of cars at N25bn, computer software acquisition
at N9bn etc. One would have expected that beyond the serial removal of ghost
workers that has not lead to a single prosecution and has always been a public
relations stunt for successive governments, the entire Nigerian budgets will
solely prioritize not a cluster of administrative capital projects but
developmental capital projects with direct impact on the people. The ballpark
figure of N1.2tn thrown around has no public details. How can such amount be
spent with serial commissioning of projects since the Kaduna-Abuja rail? This
means Nigerians are probably not seeing it or certain persons are economical
with the truth. Well, I can easily be proven wrong with clear definition of
capital projects funded. We continuously hear of the Efficiency Unit as a
“placeholder point” but no real understanding of its operations and savings
that helped government fulfill regarding bureaucracy.
I am happy that with Kemi
Adeosun’s argument, the Federal Government clearly sees where Nigeria’s fiscal
problem lies. The critical challenge has always been the size of public
revenues, too low for a country of our population and economic size. This is
why we must not fetishize our debt-to-GDP numbers currently at 17.1%. That
Nigeria has a huge GDP and has not been able to maximize public revenues from
it attest to the poor appraisal of the current GDP structure or the approach we
have taken that poorly discourage tax payments. From 29% debt-to-revenue ratio
in 2014, the Federal Government has moved to 44.7% in 2016. This means that
from every 100 Naira that FG receives, it spends 44 Naira on servicing debts.
In a recent Pew Research study, it was stated that as at 2015, Brazil spent 42%
of its revenue to service debts, being the highest in the world. This shows
that while Nigerian debt size might be low, the cost of servicing debt is high
among its peers. We must not fall for low debt-to-GDP figures; it is the single
incomplete story. Bond interests have not toppled 16% in past year, and the
badge that the Nigerian government flashes is that portfolio investors now
savor our sweet debt. Who would not with cool interest rates and guaranteed
exchange rate exits? The Nigerian government is running a cool social security
for the Nigerians who can afford its debt, distorting incentives for the growth
of private capital.
It is also unfortunate
that FG is also crowding the banks of retail savers launching bond issuance
capped at 12-13%. This excludes its Federal Government debt to CBN that has
risen from N866bn in February 2015 to N5.189tn as at July 2017. Imagine a
scenario at when there are multiple options of bonds and treasury bills at tax
and risk-free rates, which bank would borrow to the private sector? In the 2016
Budget Implementation Report by the Budget office, it was stated that “Credit
to government grew by 27.44% when compared with the end September 2016 figure
of N3.66 trillion….Credit to the private sector (Cp) slumped by 2.93% to ₦21.98
trillion at end-December 2016 from ₦22.65 trillion at end-September 2016
indicating crowding out .”
Think of a country with
the debt to the government at a faster pace than credit to the private sector
that also needs private capital to reach growth rates of 7% in 2020 as stated
in its Economic Recovery and Growth Capital (ERGP). It is also important that
government rates have been private lending benchmark in Nigeria now around 25%.
With this administration, the only business in town as been government. This
administration made a chore out of commissioning private plants but underneath
the numbers is a frustrated Nigerian who can’t get capital from the bank
because fiscal management have disincentivized this. This is why conversations
of debt should not be in size. It is how does FG reduce the cost of borrowing
and most especially the domestic offerings that now touches every upper and
middle class bracket of the society.
Nigeria’s debt service
costs will reach N1.6tn in 2017, closing on its personnel costs of N1.8tn, this
is the worry that should be triggering debates on well-structured quantitative
easing not government out-borrowing everyone in the space. The current approach
of substituting local debt with dollar-denominated debt is also faulty. What
should be the purpose of raising external debt? With oil being our main foreign
earner at 95% of receipts, is Nigeria not supposed to be borrowing for
infrastructure or making investments to correct this imbalance that puts
Nigerian currency on a wrong footing every time that oil markets go into a dip?
As stated in the Economic
Growth Recovery Plan “Nigeria’s peers raise an average 16 per cent of GDP from
non-resource taxes; Nigeria raises just 3 per cent (2015).” The plan also
states a target to “increase tax to GDP ratio from the current 6 per cent to 15
per cent during the period.” With a targeted GDP of N137.331tn in 2020, we are
talking about tax revenues of N20tn, which is nearly eight times the current
total non-oil revenue taxes. This means Nigeria needs to at least multiply its
taxes eight times to meet the 2020 target. Despite the efforts shown by Kemi
Adeosun in the piece, it shows that it will always be inadequate without a
proper reflection on why do we have a huge GDP but little taxes? What is the
structure of the GDP that makes it impossible to collect taxes? Has the
Nigerian government shown enough faith in the management of public taxes that
make it more deserving? These are the conversations that need to be honked
because the current approach is a reflection of growth rates in the past and
shows that without robust thinking our public revenues will not rise.
I believe the debt debate
is rooted in the fact that Nigerian government is taking the escapist approach,
racking up debt in quick numbers, rapidly forgetting where before exit of
creditors. This escapist approach of taking gradual steps on revenue but giant
footsteps on debt is what is being questioned. Nigerian leaders in 18 months
have shopped everywhere - AfDB, World Bank, retail savers, bondholders,
Eurobond, portfolio investors, Sukuk bonds, treasury bills to pay its own cost.
A dive into its budget implementation reports shows that its numbers doesn’t
add up such as how did Nigeria finance actual deficit of N1.02tn for 2016 after
counting at bond receipts. How is FG also entitled to Paris Club refund and
what is the source of the N1.64tn extra-statutory fund provided to states?
In fact, most of the
projects tied to these debts especially rail do not have any known economic
importance and are not fastened to the idea that such projects should be
self-liquidating. They are mainly for political expediency, and this is why
this debate is necessary. The Nigerian government should provide effective
plumbing in raising revenues, rein on debt service costs with favor for
long-term bonds as well as rates that consider private sector lending,
evidently reduce overheads and administrative capital items and overall unleash
transparency on every issue. Here we see monetary authorities (CBN) limiting
liquidity in a bid to keep Naira at a preferred value by mopping up funds in
circulation through borrowing, the fiscal authorities (government) keeps
feasting on expensive debt while everyone except their bondholders leans
through. The Nigerian government needs a lot of rigorous thinking as well as
caution.
Seun Onigbinde is the co-founder of BudgIT. He tweets via
Source: saharareporters.com
No comments: