Even a stranger would
not need any comprehensive briefing to know that Nigeria is not at ease, and
Nigerians are not sleeping easy. All a first comer to the country needs to
comprehend the situation is to scan the headlines, listen to radio news
bulletins and watch prime time television.
The past week had been particularly frightening. During the
week, the country’s political temperature spiked dangerously toward a boiling
point. Apart from Boko Haram, which continues to unleash mayhem in some parts
of the north, especially North East, despite being ‘defeated’, the South East,
and some parts of the South-South, have been on edge. The spiralling tension
was largely induced by the increased intensity of the campaign by Nnamdi Kanu,
leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, IPOB, for the actualisation of the
Republic of Biafra.
Signs
of trouble emerged, last weekend, as the military announced that it was
commencing Operation Python Dance II on Friday, September 15, running through
October 15. Like its precursor, Operation Python Dance I, the military high
command explained that the second stanza aims at fighting rising crime in the
state. But many citizens saw the move as targeting Kanu and his co-agitators.
However,
true to its words, the military, over the weekend, moved soldiers and equipment
to strategic towns in the state. This led to a violent, last Sunday, between
IPOB members and soldiers, in Umuahia, the Abia State capital. Several people
sustained injuries during the face-off.
Tuesday afternoon, another
confrontation at a military check-point at Obehie, Abia State, but which spread
to Oyigbo Junction in Port Harcourt, Rivers State, resulted in the death of a
policeman. Three other policemen were reportedly injured while two Police vans
were burnt. On Thursday, a Chief Magistrate Court sitting in Port Harcourt, ordered
32 persons, all suspected to be IPOB members, to be remanded in prison. That
was after they had been arraigned for murder, armed robbery, unlawful assembly
and treasonable felony.
By the same Thursday, the
fire had spread to the middle belt. According to reports, an altercation over
the appropriateness or otherwise of the violent clash between IPOB members and
soldiers on Operation Python Dance in Abia State triggered a war between some
Hausas and Igbos in parts of Jos, the Plateau State capital. By the time the
storm subsided, two people had been killed. Since then, Jos, like Aba and
Umuahia, has been under a security lockdown. Governor Simon Lalong, like Okezie
Ikpeazu, his Abia State counterpart, promptly clamped a dusk-to-dawn curfew on
the tin city.
With
all these, some people have been beating the drums of war at ear-tearing
decibel. Many have been baying for blood. The social media is threatening to
burst at its seams with the tons and tons of hate messages. Brothers are
tearing brothers apart with all manner of invectives. Facebook, twitter and
whatsapp are brimming with all kinds of pernicious propaganda. The maze is an
admixture of truth, ‘truths’ cloaked in variegated colours, half-truths, and
outright lies packaged and delivered with patriotic fervour. Then, there is
this vulgarity that makes the blood boil and the heart threatening to jump out
of the thoracic cavity.
You
also see people coming out boldly to express their willingness to die for the
cause they so fervently espouse. It is so scary you would think we are on the
verge of war. Things may get worse if the Muhammadu Buhari Administration fails
to handle the very volatile situation with wisdom. Like experiences have
shown around the world, tanks do not necessarily bring peace. Dialogue does.
Frank talk does. Negotiation does. The spirit of give-and-take usually
prevails.
It is
very easy to start a war. But when wisdom takes a flight and the first shot is
fired, and force and brutality takes over, and men, women, children, the
infirmed and the vulnerable begin to die, the road to resolution becomes
tortuous. And extremely costly. Think of the destruction that accompanies wars.
Think of the humanitarian catastrophe that signposts wars. Think of the lives
that would be scared and irremediably ruined in the aftermath of war. Think of
those who would die that don’t have to. Think of the despoiling of land and
nature. Add all these up, and ask yourself if war is worth the sword. The truth
is, the cost of war is difficult to quantify.
Another
truth is, no matter the justification or morality for war, irrespective of
whatever motivates the gladiators to bombs and nukes, combatants would still
come to the roundtable one way or another. Even in the bitterest of wars,
people must still meet at some point to talk.
The
Colombian situation best illustrates this point. For 50 years, the
Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (or Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias de
Colombia, FARC, in Spanish), alongside some guerrilla movements, fought the
Columbian security forces to a standstill. The masterminds of FARC formed the
movement to pursue a campaign of agrarianism and anti-imperialism. Like most
insurgencies, they funded their operations through kidnap, ransom, illegal
mining, distribution of illicit drugs, and sundry taxation of economic
activities.
For
50 years, FARC and their fellow guerrilla organisations unleashed some of the
worst mayhem the world has ever known, resulting in thousands and thousands of
deaths. The war claimed 220,000 lives; and between 1985 and 2012, about five
million people got displaced, creating the world’s second-biggest humanitarian
crisis. Still, in the midst of those annihilating crises, the combating sides
still found time to talk. And after many rounds of talks and negotiations, FARC
gave up the fight and surrendered their arms. Like a compassionate father
welcoming his prodigal son home, Juan Manuel Santos, President of Colombia
since August 7, 2010, opened his arms to welcome FARC and its leaders. On
September 1, 2017, the former guerrilla movement transformed a political party
known as the Common Alternative Revolutionary Force. This was made possible
through dialogue; repugnant as FARC’s activities had been to a majority of
Colombians and the civilised world.
Imagine
how many lives would have been saved had both rebels and government talked, say
at the onset of the crisis. Most of those thousands that died would have been
alive. The point is, it is much easier and far less agonising to jaw-jaw than
to war-war; if you permit the cliché. My prayer is that wisdom would not fail
all the armies involved in the ongoing sabre-rattling and they would converge
in a room, or a hall, or inside the rock, or wherever, look one another in the
face, and talk sincerely. And sort things out.
To
many Nigerians, Nnamdi Kanu is a terrible irritant. To many more, he is one
malignity they would do anything and everything to avoid. Others see him as an
ethnic irredentist who lacks a sense of history and is hell-bent to lead his
people to Golgotha. Yet, to those who believe in him and his crusade, he is a
patriot who wants the best and is canvassing what he thinks is the best for his
people. And this category of people would lay down their lives to defend him.
The
reality is, hate or like his ways, the young man has been able to build a cult
of followership that if he’s not carefully handled, he could give the country
some truly agonising moments. That is the last thing any right-thinking person
would wish for Nigeria at this point. Or, don’t we have enough problems as
thing are?
No
matter how irritating Nnamdi Kanu may sound in his separatist agitation, the
Muhammadu Buhari Administration must talk with him. There is nothing under the
heaven that cannot be discussed and negotiated. If the federal government can
talk and, indeed, negotiate with Boko Haram, an organisation that has wreaked
so much havoc in most parts of the north, especially the North East, there is
nothing sacrilegious in discussing with Nnamdi Kanu and his IPOB. The
administration must consider dialogue in this case for the sake of the poor
masses of this country who have nowhere to run to if the situation snowballs
into war, and for the sake of generations on the way.
God
bless Nigeria.
Source: saharareporters.com
No comments: