The agitation of the Indigenous People of Biafra took a
dramatic turn in the week ended Saturday, September 23, 2017, during which the
group was proscribed and its erstwhile boastful leader, Nnamdi Kanu, took to
his heels when confronted with fired up soldiers. Also, during the week, there
was an international angle to the secessionist agitation as the Federal
Government decided to name two countries – Britain and France – as
collaborators in IPOB’s agitation.
The Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed,
told the nation on Wednesday, September 20, 2017 how Britain and France had
been tacitly complicit with IPOB in its destabilisation of Nigeria. Britain, stated the minister, continued to
tolerate Radio Biafra’s hate and incendiary broadcasts from London while France
was said to be the financial clearing house of IPOB from where funds flowed to
the group. The minister had asserted: “Let me tell you, the financial
headquarters (of IPOB) is in France, we know” and also posed a rhetorical question : “Who
does not know that IPOB internal radio is located in London?” Mohammed explained how Britain had been
frustrating Nigeria’s diplomatic efforts with the British authorities to shut
down the pirate radio station only to be given the nebulous excuse of freedom
of speech. He had wondered: “If we have a person in Nigeria openly soliciting
arms to come and fight in the UK, what would you think of it? Would you consider that freedom of
expression?“ The minister implied that the two countries had been engaged in
semantics or what I would call diplomatic jousting. Mohammed spoke of “knotty
diplomatic issues which you need to skip” only to add in a double talk “I don’t
want any diplomatic row”. Of course, the minister knew the charges against the
two countries would spark diplomatic skirmishes, perhaps, low level, for now.
Well, these are trying times in Nigeria and nationalist
fervour demands that the country must be ready to ruffle some diplomatic nests
in defence of the sanctity of her territorial integrity and sovereignty. There is reciprocity in
diplomatic relations. We need to remember that Britain and France have played
ignoble roles in the international arena in recent times under the self-serving
subterfuge called “International community”. Britain followed the United States
to declare war on Iraq on the lie that Iraqi President, Saddam Hussein, had
“weapons of mass destruction” which must be neutralised. They ended up
destroying that country and got its president hanged, as a rub in. Yet, Tony
Blair, the then British Prime Minister, who stridently orchestrated Gulf War 11
could still face the world and declare that he had no apology for the
destruction of Iraq, a country that has not known peace since. Such brazenness!
Such denial of criminal culpability by a British Prime Minister who had made a
pastime of pillorying President Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe whose main offence
was winning re-elections in his country. Apparently, Blair, with imperialist
hangover, wanted a regime change in Zimbabwe but met more than his match in
President Mugabe, who once derisively called him Tony b-Liar. You see, the old
Zimbabwean warhorse was right, Tony Blair lied on Iraq. So, if Britain condoned
the Iraqi war, why is the Nigerian government peeved by the British High
Commission’s statement condoning Radio Biafra’s hate and inciting broadcasts on
the puerile doctrine of freedom of expression? The same Britain that shut down
the internet when youths went on the rampage in London on the excuse that they
were using it to network and mobilise Prime Minister, chubby boy, David
Cameron, in an expansive mood, once described Nigeria as a “fantastically
corrupt” country, another brazenness from a country that is fantastically a
receiver of stolen funds, being the financial capital of the world, both legitimate
and illicit. Well, it was good riddance, as the political gambler fantastically
lost the Brexit vote that saw to his exit from 10 Downing Street, the Prime
Minister’s official residence.
As for France, it supported Biafra 1 and facilitated Emeka
Ojukwu’s exile in Ivory Coast, her satellite nation; so, it should be no
surprise that it is the financial clearing house for IPOB, the leading agent
for Biafra 11. France was indicted in the Rwanda Genocide of 1994, in which an
estimated 800,000 Tutsis lost their lives, for being complicit with the then
Hutu-led government. France also led the Western onslaught on Libya that saw
the killing of Libyan leader, Muammar Gaddafi. In 2011, France, brazenly
thwarted the will of the Ivorian people, when under the cover of “International
community” mandate, it provided military support for a candidate, Alassane
Quattara, in Cote D’Ivoire’s disputed presidential election to capture a
sitting African President, Laurent Gbagbo! Gbagbo had won the majority in the main
election and was pronounced winner of the re-run by the country’s
Constitutional Court only for the UN Representative in Cote D’Ivoire to assume
the role of electoral commission to declare Quattara as the winner! Sadly,
Nigeria’s naïve President Goodluck Jonathan, as ECOWAS leader, had endorsed the
UN envoy’s verdict, and consequent UN mandate, which accorded French military
incursion a dubious legitimacy. Cote D’Ivoire is France’s milking cow, a
situation President Gbagbo had ended, so the empire struck back. With Quattara,
who is married to a French woman, in charge, France has returned to gravy train
in Cote D’Ivoire while President Gbagbo languishes in detention at The Hague
facing criminal charges at the International Court of Justice. The West sent Gbagbo
to jail for a domestic election dispute, but Tony Blair still struts around, a
free man. Talk of the hypocrisy of the “International community”!
Nigeria’s political leadership should be under no
illusion about affectionate love from Britain or France, and, by extension,
western countries. Britain and France are yesterday’s countries, over whose
empires the sun has set, now playing a fickle third fiddle in international
power relations and struggling for residual
relevance in Africa. Nigeria, on the other hand, is a country of the future
with great potential which some vested interests may not want manifested being
a threat to their hegemonic hold. You see, no country in Europe has Nigeria’s
landmass, natural resources or population. According to worldometers.info
(2017), the combined population of Britain (66.2 million) and France (64.9
million) is 131.1 million compared to Nigeria’s 192.06 million while the
combined landmass of Britain and France is 789,487 sq km as against Nigeria’s
910,770 sq km. Given these endowments plus high calibre human capital, the
prospects of Nigeria as the great Black Hope are bright. We can now begin to understand why many
countries would have dubious designs on Nigeria and would not be averse to its
disintegration.
Dr. Olawunmi,
Senior Lecturer, Department of Mass Communication, Bowen University, Iwo and former Washington Correspondent of the
News Agency of Nigeria, is a Fellow, Nigerian Guild of Editors. Email: olawunmibisi@yahoo.com Phone 0803 364 7571
Source: punchng.com
No comments: