When
on 19th April this year President Muhammadu Buhari ordered the suspension of
the Secretary to the Government of the Federation (SGF), Mr David Babachir
Lawal and the Director General of the National Intelligence Agency (NIA),
Ambassador Ayo Oke, he instituted a three-man committee headed by Vice
President Yemi Osinbajo to investigate the allegations against the duo. For
those who felt that setting a committee to deal with straight-forward matters
was needless, they were comforted by the fact that there would be a quick
closure on the matter since the committee had just two weeks to submit its
report.
However,
more than five months after, the opposition politicians who dismiss President
Buhari’s war against graft as insincere in conception and selective in
implementation may be having the last laugh. In case the president is not aware,
the talk in town is that the much-touted war of his administration against
corruption is more a weapon to deal with political opponents than an agenda to
enthrone transparency and accountability in Nigeria. And he has done so much in
the last two years to prove them right.
Regardless
of all the tales about the former Petroleum Minister, Mrs Diezani
Alison-Madueke and Dame Patience Jonathan, which is all that the corruption war
has been reduced to lately, what discerning Nigerians can see is the same
hypocrisy, deceit and double standards of the past. While I support all genuine
efforts to rid our country of corruption and all forms of abuses within the
system, such efforts must be blind to personal or political affiliations of the
leader if it is to be enduring. Selective application of those to hold
accountable and those to allow free reign can only undermine any attempt to
fight graft. Unfortunately, that is what is happening in Nigeria today.
Indeed,
there is a general perception that this administration protects its own and
that may explain why many opposition politicians who have corruption cases
against them are trooping to the All Progressive Congress (APC) where the broom
is evidently big enough to sweep any and every act of corruption under the Aso
Rock carpet. In a way, the statement by Senator Shehu Sani has become
prophetic: “When it comes to fighting corruption in the National Assembly and
the Judiciary and in the larger Nigerian sectors, the President uses
insecticide, but when it comes to fighting corruption within the Presidency,
they use deodorants.”
Against
the background that President Buhari came to power with his personal integrity
and a campaign promise that he would fight corruption in office, Senator’s
Sani’s description, which fits, should compel introspection in Aso Rock. After
several political bigwigs in the opposition Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) have
been called to account, including some of them being handcuffed to court, the
big one came when a committee of the Senate, controlled by the same ruling
party, indicted the SGF of fiddling with the money meant for the most
vulnerable of our society: those displaced by the Boko Haram insurgency.
The
expectation was that the president would use the opportunity to prove the
credibility of his anti-corruption war. One, the president said, and quite
correctly, that Lawal had a right to defend himself against allegations of
impropriety, a right he believed the Senate denied his man before coming up
with the report. So, one cannot fault the president’s decision to subject the
Senate report to his own investigation. Two, the person involved is close to
President Buhari who has a reputation when it comes to dealing with friends and
associates. It is said that if you have the trust of the president, you can get
away with any wrongdoing because he would defend you regardless of the
evidence.
Given
the foregoing, Nigerians waited eagerly to see how the president would handle
this scandal. In the statement signed by presidential spokesman, Mr Femi
Adesina, a three-man committee comprising the Attorney-General of the
Federation and Minister of Justice, the National Security Adviser and headed by
the Vice President was directed to investigate “the allegations of violations
of law and due process made against the Secretary to the Government of the
Federation (SGF), Mr David Babachir Lawal, in the award of contracts under the
Presidential Initiative on the North East (PINE).”
The
same committee was also directed “to conduct a full scale investigation into
the discovery of large amounts of foreign and local currencies by the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) in a residential apartment at Osborne
Towers, Ikoyi, Lagos, over which the National Intelligence Agency (NIA) has
made a claim.” The investigation, according to the statement, “is also to
enquire into the circumstances in which the NIA came into possession of the
funds, how and by whose or which authority the funds were made available to the
NIA, and to establish whether or not there has been a breach of the law or
security procedure in obtaining custody and use of the funds.”
As
it turned out, the investigations commenced the day the president was
travelling out of the country on a medical vacation that lasted more than a
hundred days. But upon return, the report was submitted to him on 23rd August
with so much song and dance. In fact, the weekly Federal Executive Council
(FEC) that was scheduled to hold the next day was cancelled because, as we were
told, the president was busy reading the report.
Unfortunately,
more than a month after receiving the said report, the president has done
nothing about the matter thus confirming Senator Sani’s declaration. Yet, if
the war against corruption in Nigeria is to have any meaning, the targets of
those to scrutinize and the reward system cannot continue to be selective. You
cannot treat some corruption cases with insecticide and some others with
deodorant and expect anybody to take you seriously.
To
the extent that justice is the anchor of peace and the premise of social
development, it is easy to locate some of the current problems in the country
in the arbitrary use of power and the promotion of selective application of
justice. And when such becomes manifest in the public space, as it is in
Nigeria today, what follows is that the people will begin to lose trust in both
the leader and the system.
The
most significant appeal of President Buhari’s candidacy in 2015 was the
national consensus then that he would be principled, decisive, firm and precise
on matters of public morality. Sadly, his failure to act promptly and
decisively at critical moments when the public expected clarity has dulled his
original appeal and cast doubts on his sincerity. In the process, the dividing
line between right and wrong in our nation has further blurred. Therefore, the
burden for the president at this most critical period is twofold: first to
salvage the credibility of his wobbly administration and, most importantly, to
restore public confidence in his personal integrity as a genuine national
leader and moral beacon.
Olusegun
Adeniyi, Chairman of THISDAY Editorial Board.
Source: ynaija.com
No comments: