The
reticence of Britain over the recurrent massacres of Christians in Nigeria
under the directive of the current dictator of Nigeria, General Muhammad
Buhari, has been christened the silence heard around the world. In this regard,
it is quite heartening to learn of the condemnation of the terrorist activities
of the so-called Nigeria military officers in Southeastern Nigeria by the
President of the European Union Commission, Mr. Jean-Claude Junker a few days
ago. But the question everyone is asking is whether the Queen of England, the
de facto leader of imperial Britain, enabled this state-sponsored terrorism in
Africa to protect her investments on the continent.
Before
I get to the specifics about the Queen of England, let me provide a historical
perspective for the reader. For the past 100 years, Britain has enforced a
single-agenda foreign policy objective in Nigeria: exploit Nigeria’s natural
resources for the use of the British Crown. During the colonial era, Nigerians
were taxed into penury, and the collective earnings of these hardworking
indigenes were routed to Britain to power the engines of British industrial
revolution. In one instance in 1929, protesting market women were rounded up
and massacred by British officers in Southeastern Nigeria, under the directive
of the British Crown.
Between
1967 and 1970, Britain supervised the largest pogrom on African soil during the
Nigerian-Biafran civil war when more than 2 million Biafrans perished from
starvation, relentless bombardments, endless massacres and economic blockade of
the entire Southeastern region. What was most frightening was that the Command
and Control Center for the Nigerian war effort was based in London, England,
not in Lagos, Nigeria.
British
officers were calling in relentless attacks from London and their empire
minions in Nigeria led by an illiterate dictator, General Yakubu Gowon, were
chomping at the bits to carry out their ferocious orders to slaughter the
Biafrans. They were falling over themselves to reach the next fleeing pregnant
woman to slice open her belly! This callous disdain for human life was so
repugnant that John Lennon, the rock star returned his MBE to the Queen of
England in 1969; Steve Jobs, the founder of Apple renounced his Christian faith
in 1968 over the horrific images of starving and dying children all over
Biafra; and a young Columbia University student, Bruce Mayrock, set himself
ablaze in front of the United Nations building in New York and burnt himself to
death in protest against the British-supervised pogrom in Africa in 1969.
In
the run-up to this week’s massacre in Southeastern Nigeria by the empire
minions of Britain masquerading as Nigeria soldiers, the British ambassador to
Nigeria, Mr. Paul Arkwright, on April 5th, 2017 delivered an unsolicited public
‘lecture’ entitled, “Brexit: Lessons, Challenges, and Opportunities for
Nigeria,” in the Muslim part of Northern Nigeria, sending a loud dog whistle to
the Muslims to ensure that the agitation for a referendum by the leader of the
Indigenous People of Biafra, Mr. Nnamdi Kanu, was violently put down. Why in
the world would the ambassador be discussing the downsides of Brexit in
northern Nigeria, as opposed to taking his message to his countrymen and women
in England?
Following
this bizarre ‘lecture’, the governors of the Muslim states of northern Nigeria,
which are mostly under Sharia rule, flew to England for a secret meeting with
their British colonial masters where they received their marching orders. On
the heels of the meeting in England, on June 6th 2017, a group of nondescript,
paid agents and freeloaders calling themselves Arewa youths, acting under the
auspices of the governors of the Muslim states of Northern Nigeria, sent out a
hate-filled declaration demanding that the members of the Christian south,
resident in areas of the Muslim north, vacate the northern Nigerian territories
before October 1, 2017.
Then
on Wednesday, September 13th, 2017 all hell broke loose as the empire hounds
were unleashed on the civilized, peace-loving, hardworking, and unarmed
citizens of Southeastern Nigeria. The
so-called Nigerian soldiers, who are in reality, minions of imperial Britain,
descended with gusto on the Igbos of Southeastern Nigeria and committed atrocities
that cuddled the blood.
For
three days, these barbarians raped, killed, and destroyed everything in their
sights. For 48 hours, the British Broadcasting Corporation, the mouthpiece and
chief propaganda outlet of Imperial Britain, put a lid on this story to prevent
it from reaching the international community. Then when the news blew up in
their faces on global social media, BBC came out with the most horrendous fake
news story you ever heard in an attempt to whitewash this horrendous evil and
protect their rampaging zombie soldiers in Africa. They chose to interview only
the leaders of the Nigeria military and gave no voice to the relatives of the
victims of the ethnic-cleansing operation in Southeastern Nigeria. What does the former colonial mistress of Nigeria,
Queen Elizabeth, have to do with all this?
The
Queen of England is one of the richest human beings on earth but you will never
see her financial profile featured on the pages of Forbes magazine.
Interestingly, the bulk of her wealth does not come from Britain, but from
‘businesses’ that are conducted in the so-called ‘former’ British colonies,
which are vassal states that are forced to pay tribute to the British Crown to
this day!
Nigeria
is one of such vassal states and the cash cow in Nigeria is the oil-rich region
along the Bight of Biafra in Southern Nigeria. This is one part of the world
where the Queen of England will never relinquish her imperial chokehold because
she stands to lose more than 40% of her wealth in one fell swoop should the
Biafrans be allowed to exert control over their God-given resources. This was
why the British Crown, under Queen Elizabeth, supervised the deaths of two
million men, women, and children so that Britain would have unfettered access
to the sweet crude Brent flowing from the rich oil wells of the Bight of
Biafra. Read it here: https://www.jstor.org/stable/40206616; and here, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/british-interests-nigerian-tragedy-1136684.html
Quoting
a briefing from the Commonwealth Office to the British Prime Minister during
the Nigerian-Biafran war, 1967-1970, “The sole immediate British interest is to
bring the Nigerian economy back to a condition in which our substantial trade
and investment can be further developed.” Read more:
https://www.pambazuka.org/human-security/igbo-genocide-britain-and-united-states-pt2.
This has remained the British policy in Nigeria till date! This is why the
resurgent call for self-determination in the Biafran region of Nigeria is being
ferociously put down by the uniformed minions of the British Crown.
Does
the Queen like African dictators? On May 9th through 12th 1989, the Queen of
England hosted the then dictator of Nigeria, General Muhammad Babangida in
London. During this visit, she threw a three-day party in his honor, rode in
the royal carriage with this vile dictator from Victoria Station to Buckingham
Palace, and lavished him with rare awards and honors from the British Empire,
all for one single reason: General Babangida had opened up the spigots of the
Nigerian oil wells to the British Crown. See it here: https://www.paimages.co.uk/image-details/2.21115011
In
this signature, global, anti-democratic act, the Queen of England openly
legitimized a blood-thirsty dictator in exchange for oil! General Babangida
would go on to destroy the Nigerian economy through monumental corruption and
ultra-reckless economic policies. Interestingly, no democratically elected
leader in Africa has received such an attention from Queen Elizabeth; not even
the immortal Nelson Mandela was so feted and festooned with medals and garlands
as the blood-thirsty dictator, Babangida!
It
is a shame that the Queen of England and her family are bent on supervising
another pogrom in Nigeria just to maintain their stranglehold on the oil wells
of the Bight of Biafra. It is also regrettable that the Queen of England has
turned a deaf ear to the anguish of fellow Christians in Africa just because
imperial Britain wants to continue to line its purse with proceeds from the
sale of Nigerian oil deposits. As immortal Chaucer would write in Canterbury
Tales, “See how these Christians love one another.” Unwittingly, while the
‘holy’ Archbishop of Canterbury and his Queen were supervising a pogrom in
Africa; Steve Jobs, John Lennon, and Bruce Mayrock showed the entire world what
true Christianity looked like without opening a page of the Bible!
We
ask all well-meaning individuals living in Britain, US, and elsewhere to show
their support for the beleaguered indigenes of Southeastern Nigeria who are
being slaughtered like cattle while British politicians and royalties are busy
collecting oil inducements from their minions running the Nigeria government.
Nothing short of continued peaceful demonstrations in Britain and other places
will shame these bribe takers into ignominy.
In
reality, Nigeria is not a sovereign nation: it is a gory British plantation run
by the empire minions and jesters of Britain for the sole interest of the
British Crown. The unholy treaty between the British Crown and the Moslem
Hausa-Fulani tribe ensures that the Hausa-Fulanis hold the keys to the
plantation, and in turn allow their British overlords unfettered access to the
bounties of the plantation. And whenever any group of plantation workers dares
to drop their shackles and demand their freedom, the rabid empire hounds would
bare their fangs and maul such upstarts to pieces to ensure the survival of the
plantation.
In
conclusion, if Britain is truly a nation of civilized people and culture, then
let it demonstrate it by restraining her empire minions in Africa, and allow
the Biafrans to file out of the plantation and find their place in the rising
sun.
Source: saharareporters.com
No comments: